I've said this before, but it's been awhile and @GreatDismal had a short thread reminding me of it.
Value is the ratio between benefit and cost. It's contextual; five hundred dollar shoes that let you walk without pain (unlike all those other shoes) are great value. Maybe not for someone else, but for you.
In general, if a business is trying to deliver value, they're competing to sell you something that gives you greater benefit per unit cost. A value-delivering business needs to be making a profit -- they want to stay in business, and using profit as a measure of value-add if you're not making a profit there's no general agreement that you're adding value -- but must not be, cannot be, motivated by profit.
A profit-maximizing business -- the point is to make as much money as possible -- has to do at least one of reduce the benefit or increase the cost. That is, they deliver less at a particular price (increasing their profit margin) or charge more for the same delivery (increasing their profit margin).
Once you accept profit maximization as a legitimate objective, this is systemic; intent doesn't much enter into it. As a result, you get people lamenting that it's no longer possible to buy a new-made pair of pants of the quality that was generally available in 1980. The drive for maximized profit -- capitalism -- has destroyed the ability within human civilization. (This is far from the only example!)
Think of profit-maximization as a virtue is analogous to a fungal parasite, slowly pulling all the nutrients out of its living host organism. It's not markets, it's not exchange; it's about the destruction of value to capture a greater share of the money. (Money which is useless after the inevitable collapse.)
Greed remains a sin.
04 June 2019
Capitalism destroys value
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
"Think of profit-maximization as a virtue is analogous to a fungal parasite"
More of a cancer. fungal parasites reproduce, cancers just burn out the host body then die.
+orc
I'm not going argue against any analogy that gets the essential elements -- fatal because diversion of resources to destructive things -- correct.
Post a Comment