Occasional polemics and pictures.
I think that it's more the FA-100 than the shake reduction with a 1/400th second shutter. In any case the middle of the flower macro is niiiiiice.
Thank you!(Hey, cool; I hadn't realized the GIMP was passing that much exif data through to the JPEGs.)I think -- and will admit I haven't done anything really quantified to test the belief -- that the shake reduction still helps a bit at 1/400.If only by leaving me free to not fuss about "is this fast enough?" :)And yes, I really like the FA-100, large helping of the brick-nature and all.
Comment moderation should be understood to be whimsical, erratic, and absolute in its operation.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.
I think that it's more the FA-100 than the shake reduction with a 1/400th second shutter. In any case the middle of the flower macro is niiiiiice.
ReplyDeleteThank you!
ReplyDelete(Hey, cool; I hadn't realized the GIMP was passing that much exif data through to the JPEGs.)
I think -- and will admit I haven't done anything really quantified to test the belief -- that the shake reduction still helps a bit at 1/400.
If only by leaving me free to not fuss about "is this fast enough?" :)
And yes, I really like the FA-100, large helping of the brick-nature and all.