tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-105242361638428746.post2589736990777897689..comments2023-03-24T21:49:49.118-04:00Comments on Dubious Prospects: Old and NewGraydonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09839374676813519438noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-105242361638428746.post-4856584661136008172008-08-18T21:42:00.000-04:002008-08-18T21:42:00.000-04:00Oh, sure; Ansel Adams certainly did everything he ...Oh, sure; Ansel Adams certainly did everything he could to get the image he wanted, and I know that. <BR/><BR/>It's more that changing what's there in a removal sense feels different from changing the exposure or the colour balance of the whole (which I certainly do! that's why one shoots in raw, after all). I don't think this is cheating; it does feel like something that's on one end of a Graydonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09839374676813519438noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-105242361638428746.post-30862347851717439442008-08-18T16:58:00.000-04:002008-08-18T16:58:00.000-04:00re: artistic purity.the best photographers back in...re: artistic purity.<BR/><BR/>the best photographers back in the days of film dickered around with their images in the darkroom. the whole idea of artistic purity seems to neglect that little fact.<BR/><BR/>methinks as long as there's disclosure, i'm much more interested in an interesting image than in it being "pure".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com